9:57 a.m.
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
It's just getting worse, so whoever is committing stuff lately, please take a look,
you
might have broken something.
10:32 a.m.
Just looking at a few tests which should not have regressed that are
shown as failing:
one-test:
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.bank.test.BankEJB20StressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 11.5 sec
one-test:
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.cts.test.StatefulSessionUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 145.062 sec
one-test:
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.cmp2.commerce.CompleteUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 13.078 sec
work when run individually, so I assume its some side effect of an
earlier failure.
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
It's just getting worse, so whoever is committing stuff lately, please
take a look, you might have broken something.
11:13 a.m.
This run...
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
...has 154 regressions (I believe) due to my change:
http://fisheye.jboss.com/changelog/JBossAS/?cs=70397
...which I'm looking into, but so far as I can tell is correct behavior,
so I'm going to post something for a higher power's review and figure
how we can resolve.
Short answer: Working on it. :)
S,
ALR
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
It's just getting worse, so whoever is committing stuff lately, please
take a look, you might have broken something.
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Andrew Lee Rubinger
Sr. Software Engineer
JBoss EJB3
JBoss, a division of Red Hat, Inc.
http://labs.jboss.com/jbossejb3/
http://exitcondition.alrubinger.com
11:18 a.m.
Thanks Andrew.
I see a lot of those:
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Failed to resolve ejb-link: bmp.Simple
BMP from ejb-ref: bean in ejb: bmp.BMPHelperSession
at org.jboss.ejb.Container.setupEnvironment(Container.java:1176)
at org.jboss.ejb.Container.startService(Container.java:886)
Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
This run...
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
...has 154 regressions (I believe) due to my change:
http://fisheye.jboss.com/changelog/JBossAS/?cs=70397
...which I'm looking into, but so far as I can tell is correct behavior,
so I'm going to post something for a higher power's review and figure
how we can resolve.
Short answer: Working on it. :)
S,
ALR
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
>
>
> It's just getting worse, so whoever is committing stuff lately, please
> take a look, you might have broken something.
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
11:32 a.m.
The ejb2 container is using the EjbRefMetaData.getJndiName() wrapper to
obtain the name to bind under. This is still going to the
EJBReferenceMetaData.getMappedName(). We need to update the tests in the
metadata project and first look to the
EJBReferenceMetaData.getResolvedJndiName() and then fallback to
EJBReferenceMetaData.getMappedName() in the EjbRefMetaData wrapper.
Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
This run...
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
...has 154 regressions (I believe) due to my change:
http://fisheye.jboss.com/changelog/JBossAS/?cs=70397
...which I'm looking into, but so far as I can tell is correct
behavior, so I'm going to post something for a higher power's review
and figure how we can resolve.
Short answer: Working on it. :)
S,
ALR
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
>
>
> It's just getting worse, so whoever is committing stuff lately,
> please take a look, you might have broken something.
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
11:34 a.m.
Thx, I'm in there now.
We have a LOT of metadata objects. Good thing they all have the same
name. ;)
S,
ALR
Scott M Stark wrote:
The ejb2 container is using the EjbRefMetaData.getJndiName() wrapper
to
obtain the name to bind under. This is still going to the
EJBReferenceMetaData.getMappedName(). We need to update the tests in the
metadata project and first look to the
EJBReferenceMetaData.getResolvedJndiName() and then fallback to
EJBReferenceMetaData.getMappedName() in the EjbRefMetaData wrapper.
Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
> This run...
>
>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
>
>
> ...has 154 regressions (I believe) due to my change:
>
> http://fisheye.jboss.com/changelog/JBossAS/?cs=70397
>
> ...which I'm looking into, but so far as I can tell is correct
> behavior, so I'm going to post something for a higher power's review
> and figure how we can resolve.
>
> Short answer: Working on it. :)
>
> S,
> ALR
>
> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
>>
>>
>> It's just getting worse, so whoever is committing stuff lately,
>> please take a look, you might have broken something.
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
--
Andrew Lee Rubinger
Sr. Software Engineer
JBoss EJB3
JBoss, a division of Red Hat, Inc.
http://labs.jboss.com/jbossejb3/
http://exitcondition.alrubinger.com
6132
days inactive
6132
days old
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrew Lee Rubinger -
Dimitris Andreadis -
Scott M Stark