11:56 a.m.
I've got JBoss Head compiling with Java6.
I managed to avoid using a preprocessor for the JDBC rar
but only by using reflection to decide which
version of the code is in the classpath, i.e. JDK5/JDK6
The reflection is only done once. but
there is more duplicate code that there would otherwise be.
e.g. WrappedPreparedStatementJDK6 can't extend
both WrappedPreparedStatement and WrappedStatementJDK6 :-)
I haven't implemented the Wrapper interface fully.
This will need a revisit where it needs to "recursively"
check whether the object we wrap is itself a wrapper.
I also "commented out" the DataSourceInterceptor in varia.
I didn't convert it to JDK6.
As far as I can tell, this is not included in the distribution,
not even in docs/examples/varia.
Alex you wrote this what is happening with this?
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
12:24 p.m.
The DataSourceInterceptor and other classes in that package were
developed when I was working on the SPECjAppServer benchmark a few years
ago. The goal was to collect statistics about SQL statements executed in
a test run and per transaction. Which allowed to tune the CMP engine.
Here is a wiki page that describes how to use them
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=StatisticsCollector
Adrian Brock wrote:
I've got JBoss Head compiling with Java6.
I managed to avoid using a preprocessor for the JDBC rar
but only by using reflection to decide which
version of the code is in the classpath, i.e. JDK5/JDK6
The reflection is only done once. but
there is more duplicate code that there would otherwise be.
e.g. WrappedPreparedStatementJDK6 can't extend
both WrappedPreparedStatement and WrappedStatementJDK6 :-)
I haven't implemented the Wrapper interface fully.
This will need a revisit where it needs to "recursively"
check whether the object we wrap is itself a wrapper.
I also "commented out" the DataSourceInterceptor in varia.
I didn't convert it to JDK6.
As far as I can tell, this is not included in the distribution,
not even in docs/examples/varia.
Alex you wrote this what is happening with this?
4:08 p.m.
New subject: Compiling JBoss Branch_4_2 with Ant 1.7.x [Was: Compiling JBoss Head with Java6]
Hi,
I have many requests of people wanting to build the AS 4.2.2
(Branch_4_2) with Ant 1.7.0 and they claim it fails to build.
I assume AS 5.x already builds with Ant 1.7. Someone remembers which
were the changes that had to be made?
In the meanwhile I will ask what the problems were and try some
experiments myself, but if you already know the answer you can save me
the trouble ;-)
Regards to all,
Fernando
5:10 p.m.
New subject: Compiling JBoss Branch_4_2 with Ant 1.7.x [Was: Compiling JBoss Head with Java6]
No it does not work with 5.x either because of a buildmagic check that
is not working correctly. The version checking in the
tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent needs to be dropped:
Modified:
trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent
Log:
Drop the ant version check since it does not work with ant 1.7
Modified: trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent
===================================================================
--- trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent 2007-11-30 22:52:24 UTC
(rev 67674)
+++ trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent 2007-11-30 23:07:27 UTC
(rev 67675)
@@ -28,16 +28,6 @@
</or>
</condition>
- <fail unless="buildmagic.ant.compatible">
-
- Unsupported Ant version:
-
- ant.version=${ant.version}
-
- Please install a version which is compatible with Ant
${buildmagic.ant15.baseversion} or ${buildmagic.ant16.baseversion}.
-
- </fail>
-
<!-- JDK Detection -->
<available classname="java.lang.StackTraceElement"
property="HAVE_JDK_1.4"/>
<available classname="java.lang.Enum"
property="HAVE_JDK_1.5"/>
Fernando Nasser wrote:
Hi,
I have many requests of people wanting to build the AS 4.2.2
(Branch_4_2) with Ant 1.7.0 and they claim it fails to build.
I assume AS 5.x already builds with Ant 1.7. Someone remembers which
were the changes that had to be made?
In the meanwhile I will ask what the problems were and try some
experiments myself, but if you already know the answer you can save me
the trouble ;-)
Regards to all,
Fernando
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
5:39 p.m.
New subject: Compiling JBoss Branch_4_2 with Ant 1.7.x [Was: [jboss-dev] Compiling JBoss Head with Java6]
Ah, it is just that? So it actually builds fine with Ant 1.7.
Thanks a lot.
Scott M Stark wrote:
No it does not work with 5.x either because of a buildmagic check
that
is not working correctly. The version checking in the
tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent needs to be dropped:
Modified:
trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent
Log:
Drop the ant version check since it does not work with ant 1.7
Modified: trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent
===================================================================
--- trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent 2007-11-30 22:52:24 UTC
(rev 67674)
+++ trunk/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent 2007-11-30 23:07:27 UTC
(rev 67675)
@@ -28,16 +28,6 @@
</or>
</condition>
- <fail unless="buildmagic.ant.compatible">
-
- Unsupported Ant version:
-
- ant.version=${ant.version}
-
- Please install a version which is compatible with Ant
${buildmagic.ant15.baseversion} or ${buildmagic.ant16.baseversion}.
-
- </fail>
-
<!-- JDK Detection -->
<available classname="java.lang.StackTraceElement"
property="HAVE_JDK_1.4"/>
<available classname="java.lang.Enum"
property="HAVE_JDK_1.5"/>
Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have many requests of people wanting to build the AS 4.2.2
> (Branch_4_2) with Ant 1.7.0 and they claim it fails to build.
>
> I assume AS 5.x already builds with Ant 1.7. Someone remembers which
> were the changes that had to be made?
>
> In the meanwhile I will ask what the problems were and try some
> experiments myself, but if you already know the answer you can save me
> the trouble ;-)
>
> Regards to all,
> Fernando
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
6236
days inactive
6237
days old
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Adrian Brock -
Alexey Loubyansky -
Fernando Nasser -
Scott M Stark