Repeating again. The dev list is not a place
to answer questions from people that are too lazy
to do their own homework.
The jboss-dev mailing list is archived in many places
(including google).
A simple search should be very revealing rather expecting
us to repeat ad infinitum everytime somebody comes along
that is incapable of doing a little research.
e.g. typing "jboss integration project" into google
reveals this link on the first page:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2007-July/010319.html
"jboss embedded project" gives this
http://blogs.jboss.com/blog/bburke/2007/04/17/Embedded_JBoss_JBoss_withou...
And no, I'm not a search engine (I post the links
to make my point), don't expect me to proxy
google search requests for you all the time.
1st law of thermodynamics (rough translation :-):
You get out what you put in.
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 12:52 +0000, Tim Fox wrote:
Guys-
Could you possibly be a little more helpful?
We have new team members who can hardly be expected to know what "jboss
embedded" or "integration project" is unless you explain it.
In the absence of any wiki pages it's pretty hard to guess.
If no-one gives any more pointers then we'll just have to carry on as
we're doing now...
:)
Adrian wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:09 +0000, Andy Taylor wrote:
>
>> This is currently how we do it in JBM 1.4. Is there a Wiki page
>> explaining the correct way to integrate jbossas dependencies?
>>
>>
>
> No. But there are many discussions on this list on good
> programming practice. ;-)
>
>
>> Adrian wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 10:40 +0000, Andy Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> currently we're pulling in
>>>>
http://repository.jboss.com/jbossas/core-libs/4.2.2.GA/ this is because
>>>> as you stay we are deployable standalone and need these libraries.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's a different issue to what you should be compiling over.
>>>
>>> You should be compiling over the integration project and letting
>>> jboss-4.2.x, 5.0.x or jboss embedded (which is what you should
>>> really be using as a standalone runtime) implement them how it
>>> likes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ales Justin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Which core libs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like you're not using integration project? :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Since I guess that's the way to do it, if you want to have it
>>>>> standalone or used in different env than JBossAS.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you probably require a bunch on non existing integration pieces.
:-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy Taylor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> As part of the development of JBoss Messaging 2.0 we need the
jbossas
>>>>>> 5 core-libs. Is there any possibility of making a snapshot of
these
>>>>>> available in the repository?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development --
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx