Aren't they all development releases now you've got the EAP's ;)
Development releases would be nice if you wanted to include preview
technology that may in fact not make it into the next stable release.
--Aaron
On 03/12/2008, at 10:07 PM, Bela Ban wrote:
Go for 5.1
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> Before branching AS5 (Branch_5_0) I was wondering what would most
> people would prefer/think about the next minor JBossAS release.
>
> - Continue with the even release number legacy, i.e. 5.2.0
>
> - Scrap the legacy numbering, i.e. go for 5.1.0
>
> Cheers
> /Dimitris
>
> PS
> AFAIR, the original idea was that odd minor numbers (e.g. 5.1)
> would indicate development releases, while even numbers (5.2)
> stable production releases. This didn't worked out quite well and
> the code always targeted the next production release with Betas/RCs
> used for pre-production releases. Who would want to test drive a
> purely development release, anyway?
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development