Re: [jboss-dev] jbossas -beans.xml opt

Sure, I never implied it is the same. I might wrote it in a confusing way. AOP is there from day one --> @DisableAOP @IoC & jsr-299 --> our MC IoC should support that too; annotation based ioc And we don't use AOP with our MC @IoC. Just MDR, for already stated reasons. Sent from my iPhone On May 14, 2009, at 19:15, "Jason T. Greene" <jason.greene(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Ales Justin wrote: >> There is no magic. >> We know AOP is there from day one, >> and @annotation based IoC handling is a-must-have in these jsr-299 days. >> >> It's just that the sole nature of these mechanisms is not very >> performance friendly. > > Annotation IoC handling != AOP. This is just an implementation we > chose. The JSR-299 RI for example does not require AOP. > > The AOP dependency processing "magic" is a great example of something > we don't need for container provided annotations like @JMX. Those > should all be registered up-front. > _______________________________________________ > jboss-development mailing list > jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development