On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 10:18 -0600, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> I'll figure out why the classloader leak test is failing.
>
I've already fixed it.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBCL-85
It's some new code I did for Kabir.
If you can get hudson to download the latest jboss-cl snapshot
version 4 from here:
http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/cl/jboss-classloading/2.0.3-S...
Then the test passes.
Thanks for the heads-up! The test passed locally (since I'd rebuilt and
thus got the new snapshot). Could have wasted a lot of time trying to
reproduce. ;)
> Shelly McGowan wrote:
>> Dimitris,
>>
>>
>> Most of the tests that are failing in the Hudson runs are passing with one-test
(see below).
>>
>>
>> Nothing conclusive yet but I suspect a memory/classloader leak which is seen in
the classloader leak tests even running individually. Also the
JBoss-AS-5.0.x-compatibilityMatrix job is failing with:
>>
>> Error Message
>>
>> Unexpected Error java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
>>
>>
>>
>> Shelly
>>
>>
>>
>> /*
>> **Local test results with one-test.
>> */
>>
>> [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JMXInvokerUnitTestCase
>> [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 20.819 sec
>>
>> [junit] Running
org.jboss.test.naming.test.InternalNamingClassReplacementUnitTestCase
>> [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7.659 sec
>>
>> [junit] Running org.jboss.test.web.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCase
>> [junit] Tests run: 37, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 16.999 sec
>>
>> [junit] Running org.jboss.test.refs.test.RefResolutionUnitTestCase
>> [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.049 sec
>>
>> [junit] Running org.jboss.test.timer.test.SecureTimerUnitTestCase
>> [junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 54.267 sec
>>
>>
>> [junit] Running org.jboss.test.asynch.AsynchTestCase
>> [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.342 sec
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Shelly McGowan" <smcgowan(a)redhat.com>
>> To: dimitris(a)redhat.com, "JBoss.org development list"
<jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 7:13:08 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [jboss-dev] Help needed resolve the regression
>>
>>
>>
>> Dimitris,
>>
>> I'll take a look at what's going on.
>>
>>
>> Shelly
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dimitris Andreadis" <dandread(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "JBoss.org development list"
<jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 6:48:10 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [jboss-dev] Help needed resolve the regression
>>
>> Nobody?
>>
>>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-test...
>>
>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>> While Ales is fighting the VFS beast for the 5.0.1 release we need help
>>> to qualify and resolve the testsuite and tck regression.
>>>
>>>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-test...
>>>
>>>
>>> The majority of the failures seem to be deployment/classloader related.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> /D
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com