Its not expected to work. Its not a cross component model service. It is
possible it is being applied, the ConfigureAction is accessing the
ServiceBinding.
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
I believe SBM is enabled in the ServiceController.
Nevertheless my point is, we shouldn't retire things expected to work
from 4.x until we have working alternatives. Same goes for 'farming'.
Scott M Stark wrote:
> I don't thinks its important. Beyond the wrapper you would still need to
> enable the sbm in the ServiceController.
>
> Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> That sounds like my #2. Or are you saying load the whole unrefactored
>> thing from the deployers dir, but via a -service.xml? Possible but don't
>> know if that would cause issues.
>>
>> I can spend a couple hours today/tomorrow experimenting with the wrapper
>> concept, and maybe simply deploying via service.xml. But I don't want to
>> waste effort unless there's agreement that getting SBM to work for Beta4
>> is an important goal. And if there's consensus (e.g. from Remy) that
>> whatever I'm trying is an acceptable temporary measure if it works.
>>
>