Re: [jboss-dev] Further profling: Where should I focus?

Ok, confirmation is good. But yeah right after posting my message I read Carlo's on the other thread and thought the same thing. :) On 01/14/2010 10:07 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote: > Let's wait for Richard confirmation (he just left), but from his commits > I think at least part of the problem was basically the same Carlo's > mentioned in "Re: [jboss-dev] Integration of naming deployers failed" > regarding modules names that need to be unique. > Cheers > Alessio > > Brian Stansberry wrote: > >> Can you give an example? If there was a change in AS behavior that >> forced you to change your deployments, I'd like to understand better >> what the change was. >> >> On 01/14/2010 05:40 AM, Richard Opalka wrote: >> >> >>> I fixed the tests (to have unique archive names inside ear). >>> Now all JBossWS tests pass against AS trunk, see 601 jobs at: >>> >>> http://jbossws.jboss.org:8180/hudson/ >>> >>> IOW MC upgrade is ok for JBossWS, no problems since now ;) >>> >>> Richard >>> >>> On 01/13/2010 03:45 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote: >>> >>> >>>> If you have some spare cycles to try and analyze the cause of some of >>>> those failures, it would be very helpful. If you find anything, the "MC >>>> 2.2.x update" thread on this list is the best place to report them. >>>> >>>> On 01/13/2010 08:30 AM, Richard Opalka wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Yes, >>>>> >>>>> it's nice it boots faster. >>>>> However there are still some issues, e.g. >>>>> http://jbossws.jboss.org:8180/hudson/job/NATIVE-CORE-AS-6.0.1-SUN-JDK-6/28/ >>>>> that have to be addressed/identified :( >>>>> >>>>> Rio >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> >> > >