On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 12:31 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
I don't think it is bad to have unscheduled reports, as long as
there is
periodic review to schedule tasks. It is equally bad to use the next
release as a dumping ground and move around deferred tasks from release
to release.
I totally agree proper/periodic review is needed to categorize the
importance of tasks. There was a proposal by Andrig to do this monthly
but we didn't follow up properly.
The correct time to check all bugs have been diagnosed
is on releases. They are either dealt with or deferred.
There should be no unscheduled bugs. There should be a plan
to fix it.
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx