We haven't announced the new policy yet,
so it would be unfair to do it.
I'll start a discussion thread on it
since it was my idea originally.
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 12:02 +0200, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
ejb3-testsuite is working again.
I say rollback 78961 & 78963.
Carlo
Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> Also reverting 78963 by jhalliday: Uncommented service binding manager
> integration for JBossTS, as the new JBossTS 4.4.0.GA now supports it.
> JBAS-5919 with a side order of JBAS-5192.
>
> Carlo
>
> Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>> The clustered configs aren't working because of:
>>
>>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
>>
>>
>> TransactionManager -> com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.exceptions.FatalError:
>> [com.arjuna.ats.internal.arjuna.utils.SocketProcessId_2] -
>> SocketProcessId.getpid could not get unique port.
>>
>> My guess is 78961 by jhalliday: Upgraded JBossTS to 4.4.0.GA, adding
>> JTS elements in the process. JBAS-5919
>>
>> I'm going to do a revert locally and another run of ejb3-testsuite.
>> If that one is the culprit, I'll vote roll back at that time.
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development --
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx