Should we clone the ejb3x project:
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/ejb3/trunk/ejb3x/
to a top level:
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk
with branches, e.g.
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/branches/JAVAEE5
Scott M Stark wrote:
Agree, but this should include all classes/interfaces in a javaee x
release so its clear what the contract for that version is. Right now
its spread across the projects with the deployer/container.
Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> Put them in a separate project, so we can binary import them both in AS
> 4.x and AS 5.x. I've got a mavenized ejb3x in AS trunk/projects.
>
> Carlo
>
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 09:10 -0500, Bill Burke wrote:
>> ejb3x should really be a javaee5.jar
>>
>> that includes all the new javaee5 interfaces, etc.
>>