As far as my understanding goes... The naming convention is, RepositoryURL/GroupId/ArtifactId/VersionNo Where GroupId can be any name and ArtifactId should be the name of the jar. In the first case jboss is the GroupId and jboss-logging is the artifactId corresponding to jboss-logging-x.x.x.jar In the second case jboss.jboss-test is the groupId and jboss-test is the artifactId corresponding to jboss-test-x.x.x.jar The second convention in the best when there are multiple artifacts for a version. Say for example, we have a jboss-test-x.x.jar and a jboss-test-client-x.x.jar. Then we would have http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test/jboss-test/1.0.0.CR1 http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test/jboss-test-client/1. 0.0.CR1 In this case following the first convention would bring artifacts of different products under the same group. Any other explanations? -----Original Message----- From: jboss-development-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:jboss-development-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Loubyansky Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:45 AM To: JBoss.org development list Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss-test is missing in maven2 Could someone, please, explain the naming/path convention in the repository? For example, for jboss-logging it's http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-logging/ but the jboss-test is in the http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test/jboss-test/ Thanks, Alexey Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote: _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development