On 09/14/2009 10:45 AM, Robb Greathouse wrote: > It is interesting that all the wow factors seem to be in the products/projects vs being in the core AS. > > Am I wrong in seeing it that way? I think that's exactly how we should be pushing forward, leaving AS as an integration point for various projects. The AS then provides runtime and lifecycle. S, ALR > > Robb Greathouse > JBoss > CELL 505-507-4906 > OFFICE 505-255-2652 > FAX 505-554-2834 > > ----- "Ales Justin&quot;&lt;ales.justin(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Simply go over BMW's blog: >> - http://oddthesis.org/theses/jboss-rails/projects/jboss-rails >> >> Robb Greathouse wrote: >>> Do tell. Do you have more detail. >>> >>> Robb Greathouse >>> JBoss >>> CELL 505-507-4906 >>> OFFICE 505-255-2652 >>> FAX 505-554-2834 >>> >>> ----- "Ales Justin&quot;&lt;ales.justin(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> I like the ease with how TorqueBox was developed / integrated. >>>> >>>> Robb Greathouse wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I am putting together a workshop for JBoss AS 5.x. I am looking >>>> for >>>>> some real wow factors. And frankly, even after talking to the >> core >>>>> developers (who agree) I am not finding any wow factors. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Robb Greathouse JBoss CELL 505-507-4906 OFFICE 505-255-2652 FAX >>>>> 505-554-2834 SKYPE rgreathouse >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- "Shelly McGowan&quot;&lt;smcgowan(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jason, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> RE: >>>>>>>> Also, let me know if you have a component you would like to >>>>>>>> update/include that has low impact. >>>>>> jboss-test and jboss-server-manager currently include alpha >>>>>> releases; specifically, >>>>>> >>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.test</groupId> >>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-test</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>1.1.5-alpha-2</version> >>>>>> >>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.jbossas</groupId> >>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-server-manager</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>1.0.3-alpha-2</version> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> These were needed as part of ALRs new bootstrap implementation >>>>>> (JBASM-30, JBASM-31). Are these alpha versions acceptable for >> the >>>>>> Beta1 release or would you prefer .GA? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Shelly >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-development >>>>>> mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development >>>>> _______________________________________________ jboss-development >>>>> mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development >>>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > jboss-development mailing list > jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development -- Andrew Lee Rubinger Sr. Software Engineer JBoss by Red Hat http://exitcondition.alrubinger.com _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development