-----Original Message----- From: Brian Stansberry Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:32 PM To: Dimitris Andreadis; Scott M Stark Cc: 'JBoss.org development list' Subject: RE: [jboss-dev] Re: Commons-logging upgrade So, 2 issues: 1) Do we remove org.apache.commons.logging from FilteredPackages? I've attached 2 files showing what happens if you do this in 4.0.5 and 4.0.2 and then deploy a war with commons-logging.jar included. The 4.0.2 one shows a JaccContextValve failure that was likely the thing that led to filtering the packages. In 4.2, this works fine. IMHO, if a quick perusal of the attached files by you and Scott isn't enough to decide to remove the filtering of JCL packages, we should leave them filtered. That's a conservative approach, which is fine when we have lots of other things to worry about. 2) Patching JCL 1.1 to do late binding of log4j. That's useful, if for nothing else to support consistent behavior from 4.0.x to 4.2.0 for wars that bundle log4j but not commons-logging.jar. Definitely needed if we decide to keep the jcl package filtering. The JIRA to do the patch was assigned by you to you, so I guess you volunteered ;) You're my boss, so feel free to assign it to me. :-) But I won't touch it until the EJB3 stuff and shared sessions are done. Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > Right, so who will volunteer to get this sorted out ? :) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jboss-development-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org >> [mailto:jboss-development-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Scott >> M Stark Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 1:31 AM >> To: JBoss.org development list >> Subject: Re: [jboss-dev] Re: Commons-logging upgrade >> >> Its required in general to avoid java ee classes from being visible. >> Specificially for the jcl classes, it should not be required. >> I'm hesitant to say it can be dropped though since the problem is a >> function of the runtime class loader hierarchy that shows up for the >> various component creation/initial use patterns. I guess I need to >> reproduce the original issue to understand why its not happening now. >> >> Brian Stansberry wrote: >>> jboss-development-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org wrote: ... >>> >>> Yes. I didn't mean to imply the late binding patch no longer had >>> value; just that allowing the loading of JCL classes from the war >>> removes a large category of cases where it is needed. I also wanted >>> to hijack the thread a bit to get into whether the >> FilteredPackages was still needed. >>> :-) >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-development mailing list >> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development Brian Stansberry Lead, AS Clustering JBoss, a division of Red Hat Ph: 510-396-3864 skype: bstansberry