Aren't they all development releases now you've got the
EAP's ;)
Development releases would be nice if you wanted to include preview
technology that may in fact not make it into the next stable release.
--Aaron
On 03/12/2008, at 10:07 PM, Bela Ban wrote:
> Go for 5.1
>
> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> Before branching AS5 (Branch_5_0) I was wondering what would most
>> people would prefer/think about the next minor JBossAS release.
>>
>> - Continue with the even release number legacy, i.e. 5.2.0
>>
>> - Scrap the legacy numbering, i.e. go for 5.1.0
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Dimitris
>>
>> PS
>> AFAIR, the original idea was that odd minor numbers (e.g. 5.1)
>> would indicate development releases, while even numbers (5.2)
>> stable production releases. This didn't worked out quite well and
>> the code always targeted the next production release with Betas/
>> RCs used for pre-production releases. Who would want to test drive
>> a purely development release, anyway?
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> --
> Bela Ban
> Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
> JBoss - a division of Red Hat
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development