Let me do it. I'm nearly there in getting a minimum of rollbacks
to make the server boot.
Once I've done that I'll commit it so that others can work,
then I'll do the rest afterwards.
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:04 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
I'll try to see if reverting those changes locally works, then
try a rollback in a single
commit.
Adrian wrote:
> I think you're correct, there's lots of little commits. :-(
>
> After reverting the transaction module change, I've now got
> problems with the MDB's ServerSessionPool.
>
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: No ClassLoaders found for:
> org.jboss.jms.asf.ServerSessionPoolLoader
> at
> org.jboss.mx.loading.LoadMgr3.beginLoadTask(LoadMgr3.java:306)
> at
> org.jboss.mx.loading.UnifiedClassLoader.loadClassImpl(UnifiedClassLoader.java:290)
>
>
> An alternative strategy would be try to complete Francisco's
> change by fixing the main configuration of the server.
>
> But this will leave lots of broken tests in the testsuite
> until they are also updated with the correct configuration.
>
> e.g. MDB tests with specific JMSContainerInvoker configuration
> will fail until they are updated to use the JCA 1.5 inbound resource
> adapter config.
>
> e.g.2 There's still lots of tests using the now
> non-existant org.jboss.tm.TxManager on the client side.
>
> Also, the embedded project is broken since it hasn't yet been
> updated to use the new TM.
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:47 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> Those are the revision numbers (first one was last):
>>
>> Should we revert one by one in reverse order?
>>
>> 65826, 65825, 65820, 65819, 65818, 65817, 65816, 65815, 65814, 65813, 65812,
65811, 65810,
>> 65809, 65808, 65807, 65806
>>
>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>> I just noticed Franscisco's check-ins this morning. I think we need to
>>> revert the changes for now, but unfortunately the check-ins done were
>>> multiple.
>>>
>>> Adrian wrote:
>>>> Why has the transaction module been removed?
>>>>
>>>> The stuff required to make this work properly is still WIP:
>>>>
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4516
>>>>
>>>> In fact, I'm currently working on fixing up the testsuite
>>>> to make this possible at all.
>>>>
>>>> The XIDFactory stuff is expected as per the subtask:
>>>>
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4517
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:12 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>>>> After the removal of the transaction module, booting the
'default'
>>>>> and 'all' configs complains initially for the missing
>>>>> org.jboss.tm.XidFactory, then about missing jbossts libs...
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development --
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx