12:32 a.m.
I just modified trunk to use woodstox (lgpl) instead of the BEA derived
codehaus StAX implementation. The reasons are:
1. Better performance
2. Active community
This also removes one of the few remaining uses of the version number in
the jar name.
Let me know if this switch causes any problems.
Thanks,
-Jason
skype: jason.greene
yahoo: n1hility
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jason T. Greene
Senior Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1:42 a.m.
ok with me.
Jason T. Greene wrote:
I just modified trunk to use woodstox (lgpl) instead of the BEA
derived
codehaus StAX implementation. The reasons are:
1. Better performance
2. Active community
This also removes one of the few remaining uses of the version number in
the jar name.
Let me know if this switch causes any problems.
Thanks,
-Jason
skype: jason.greene
yahoo: n1hility
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2:51 a.m.
The codehaus stuff looks unmaintained to me?
There doesn't look much activity on the bug reports.
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:32 -0600, Jason T. Greene wrote:
I just modified trunk to use woodstox (lgpl) instead of the BEA
derived
codehaus StAX implementation. The reasons are:
1. Better performance
2. Active community
This also removes one of the few remaining uses of the version number in
the jar name.
Let me know if this switch causes any problems.
Thanks,
-Jason
skype: jason.greene
yahoo: n1hility
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
3:33 a.m.
Before we using the RI which was donated by BEA.
http://stax.codehaus.org/
If you compare the activity between:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/STAX
http://svn.stax.codehaus.org/changelog/stax/
and:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WSTX
http://svn.woodstox.codehaus.org/changelog/woodstox/
you will see a big difference.
Also, notice that the number one contributor for the RI happens to be
the lead of woodstox.
The only other implementation I am aware of is the sun stack:
https://sjsxp.dev.java.net/index.html#releases
Although last I tested it, it was significantly slower and had double
the memory footprint.
-Jason
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 18:51 +0100, Adrian wrote:
The codehaus stuff looks unmaintained to me?
There doesn't look much activity on the bug reports.
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:32 -0600, Jason T. Greene wrote:
> I just modified trunk to use woodstox (lgpl) instead of the BEA derived
> codehaus StAX implementation. The reasons are:
> 1. Better performance
> 2. Active community
>
> This also removes one of the few remaining uses of the version number in
> the jar name.
>
> Let me know if this switch causes any problems.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Jason
>
>
> skype: jason.greene
> yahoo: n1hility
>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jason T. Greene
Senior Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6306
days inactive
6306
days old
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Adrian -
Jason T. Greene -
Thomas Diesler