4:17 p.m.
As we discussed on the QA call Thursday, we have setup a test svn repository for JBossAS.
This is a snapshot of the source contained in cvs, is only for testing purposes, and will
ultimately be discarded. This repository will allow developers a chance to checkout
branches needed for development, look at their projects, get familiar with subversion,
look for any issues and to test their login privileges prior to our final migration.
The root of this repository is: HYPERLINK
"https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/mutated/"https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/mutated/
I’ve setup some getting started instructions here:
HYPERLINK
"http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SubversionMigrationGuide"http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SubversionMigrationGuide
This guide will walk you through the intial steps of how to perform common scm task using
subversion.
The initial repository load consists of the main JBoss development branches and tags. We
are currently working to add the service branches.
We’ll be discussing this further on the R&D call on Tuesday.
Ruel Loehr
JBoss QA
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
4:07 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss-dev] Test Subversion Repository now live
Hi all,
is the migration to SVN a done deal ? I just finished the SVN book, and
I must say, I'm not impressed. Okay, it has some features that make it
better than CVS, but IMO that doesn't warrant a migration to SVN yet.
Maybe it's just me, but I live happily with CVS, especially with the
tool support I have (e.g. IntelliJ).
Flames please to /dev/null, plus I'm on vacation now .. :-) No,
seriously, what are the compelling benefits of SVN that force us to
migrate to it ?
Ruel Loehr wrote:
As we discussed on the QA call Thursday, we have setup a test svn
repository for JBossAS. This is a snapshot of the source contained in
cvs, is only for testing purposes, and will ultimately be discarded.
This repository will allow developers a chance to checkout branches
needed for development, look at their projects, get familiar with
subversion, look for any issues and to test their login privileges
prior to our final migration.
The root of this repository is:
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/mutated/
I’ve setup some getting started instructions here:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SubversionMigrationGuide
This guide will walk you through the intial steps of how to perform
common scm task using subversion.
The initial repository load consists of the main JBoss development
branches and tags. We are currently working to add the service branches.
We’ll be discussing this further on the R&D call on Tuesday.
Ruel Loehr
JBoss QA
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group
JBoss - a division of Red Hat
9:37 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss-dev] Test Subversion Repository now live
Hi Bela,
I hope you enjoy your vacation! :)
We have been using Subversion internally at Novell for a few years now.
One advantage of SVN on CVS is that changes are atomic. If I change the
world and checkin, all of the source modules are checked in as one
atomic change. If 99 of 100 files are checked in but the last check in
fails, the other 99 files aren't checked in either.
If two developers change the world and checkin around the same time, one
of them will be forced to merge with the other before "any" of their
changes are taken. This means that the build should be less broken in
the future (at least it won't be because of concurrent modifications).
I also like the simple "svn status -q" command that I can enter in the
source root folder and see what a list of all my changes (I have a perl
script that does the same for cvs).
Intellij does have svn support but I'm not sure how good it is (I'm
using the command line).
Scott
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 11:07 +0200, Bela Ban wrote:
Hi all,
is the migration to SVN a done deal ? I just finished the SVN book, and
I must say, I'm not impressed. Okay, it has some features that make it
better than CVS, but IMO that doesn't warrant a migration to SVN yet.
Maybe it's just me, but I live happily with CVS, especially with the
tool support I have (e.g. IntelliJ).
Flames please to /dev/null, plus I'm on vacation now .. :-) No,
seriously, what are the compelling benefits of SVN that force us to
migrate to it ?
Ruel Loehr wrote:
>
> As we discussed on the QA call Thursday, we have setup a test svn
> repository for JBossAS. This is a snapshot of the source contained in
> cvs, is only for testing purposes, and will ultimately be discarded.
> This repository will allow developers a chance to checkout branches
> needed for development, look at their projects, get familiar with
> subversion, look for any issues and to test their login privileges
> prior to our final migration.
>
> The root of this repository is:
> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/mutated/
>
> I’ve setup some getting started instructions here:
>
> http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SubversionMigrationGuide
>
> This guide will walk you through the intial steps of how to perform
> common scm task using subversion.
>
> The initial repository load consists of the main JBoss development
> branches and tags. We are currently working to add the service branches.
>
> We’ll be discussing this further on the R&D call on Tuesday.
>
> Ruel Loehr
>
> JBoss QA
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.0/388 - Release Date: 7/13/2006
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
7304
days inactive
7307
days old
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bela Ban -
Ruel Loehr -
Scott Marlow