1:41 p.m.
Hello all,
There was a request from David, to reduce message size coming to
jboss-svn-commits email list to 250kB. Messages exceeding this limit
will be rejected.
Does anyone have any objection to this?
5:14 a.m.
If they could be truncated somehow, that would be better
On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:41, Dmytro Lisnichenko wrote:
Hello all,
There was a request from David, to reduce message size coming to
jboss-svn-commits email list to 250kB. Messages exceeding this limit
will be rejected.
Does anyone have any objection to this?
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
6:13 a.m.
And while we're at it, could we have,
something that I've asked for a long time ago,
a split between cvs, svn and what goes into our maven repo.
(OK, cvs and svn are both svn, but they are diff mls)
Since it's almost impossible to follow things when there is a release
with more than one component going on.
e.g. recent gatein had a flood of components
Kabir Khan wrote:
If they could be truncated somehow, that would be better
On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:41, Dmytro Lisnichenko wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> There was a request from David, to reduce message size coming to
> jboss-svn-commits email list to 250kB. Messages exceeding this limit
> will be rejected.
>
> Does anyone have any objection to this?
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
9:40 a.m.
What's the reason to reject the large messages? For filtering spam?
I agree with Ales that I would like to see a separation between regular svn
commits and commits to repository.jboss.org.
Ales Justin wrote:
And while we're at it, could we have,
something that I've asked for a long time ago,
a split between cvs, svn and what goes into our maven repo.
(OK, cvs and svn are both svn, but they are diff mls)
Since it's almost impossible to follow things when there is a release
with more than one component going on.
e.g. recent gatein had a flood of components
Kabir Khan wrote:
> If they could be truncated somehow, that would be better
> On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:41, Dmytro Lisnichenko wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> There was a request from David, to reduce message size coming to
>> jboss-svn-commits email list to 250kB. Messages exceeding this limit
>> will be rejected.
>>
>> Does anyone have any objection to this?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
9:44 a.m.
The specific impetus was the slew of mutli-megabyte commits by the ESB
team, but the repository emails also tend to be large from time to time
(though this only happens when a JAR is uploaded in text format - something
that is still surprisingly common even yet).
Figuring out the deal with the CVS vs SVN lists would be nice.
The only reason that rejection is the proposed policy is because that's the
only one which can be implemented without any development work. And
currently, development + eng-ops = never gonna get done, so it's this or
nothing.
- DML
On 10/23/2009 08:40 AM, Paul Gier wrote:
What's the reason to reject the large messages? For filtering
spam?
I agree with Ales that I would like to see a separation between regular svn
commits and commits to repository.jboss.org.
Ales Justin wrote:
> And while we're at it, could we have,
> something that I've asked for a long time ago,
> a split between cvs, svn and what goes into our maven repo.
> (OK, cvs and svn are both svn, but they are diff mls)
>
> Since it's almost impossible to follow things when there is a release
> with more than one component going on.
> e.g. recent gatein had a flood of components
>
> Kabir Khan wrote:
>> If they could be truncated somehow, that would be better
>> On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:41, Dmytro Lisnichenko wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> There was a request from David, to reduce message size coming to
>>> jboss-svn-commits email list to 250kB. Messages exceeding this limit
>>> will be rejected.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any objection to this?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
5296
days inactive
5297
days old
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Ales Justin -
David M. Lloyd -
Dmytro Lisnichenko -
Kabir Khan -
Paul Gier