Re: [jboss-dev] Accelerated 5.1 Timeline (New Dates!)
by Rodney Russ
Hey Max, Is Dmitris running AS 5.1 or Jason?
----- "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Anyone care to comment on this ?
>
> You won't get much tooling support if you are ignoring our mails about
>
> how to improve it ;)
>
> /max
> >
> >> I guess, now!
> > We won't be around much before after eclipsecon ;(
> >
> > But lets get it started at least.
> >
> > Any way to get a "restfull"/non-binary-dependent API to a running
> > appserver/profileservice ?
> >
> > or is there a client only api/jar set for profileservice that won't
>
> > change or at least be backward compatible going forward
> > so tooling won't break when a new AS or EAP release comes out ?
> >
> > Any way for the profileservice to provide deployment-local
> > exception/error/debug info ?
> >
> > /max
> >
> >>
> >> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> At what phase/time-period would tools requirements be discussed ?
> >>>
> >>> Last time we said early april but with this schedule is there any
>
> >>> room for that ?
> >>>
> >>> /max
> >>>> Due to recent changes in the EAP5 schedule, we have had to
> >>>> significantly pull in our community dates. The new CR1 and GA
> dates
> >>>> are as follows:
> >>>>
> >>>> CR1
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Code/Component Freeze : April 20th
> >>>> Final Console Inclusion : April 22nd
> >>>> Release : April 27th
> >>>>
> >>>> GA
> >>>> --
> >>>> Code/Component Freeze : May 11th
> >>>> Release : May 25th
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> There is now only 1 goal, and that is meeting our dates with a
> >>>> working console.
> >>>>
> >>>> This also means profile service work is the priority:
> >>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6620
> >>>>
> >>>> All other updates are a nice to have, and if you want them
> included
> >>>> in 5.1, they need to be done as early as possible.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> jboss-development mailing list
> >>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jboss-development mailing list
> >> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
17 years
Accelerated 5.1 Timeline (New Dates!)
by Jason T. Greene
Due to recent changes in the EAP5 schedule, we have had to significantly
pull in our community dates. The new CR1 and GA dates are as follows:
CR1
---
Code/Component Freeze : April 20th
Final Console Inclusion : April 22nd
Release : April 27th
GA
--
Code/Component Freeze : May 11th
Release : May 25th
There is now only 1 goal, and that is meeting our dates with a working
console.
This also means profile service work is the priority:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6620
All other updates are a nice to have, and if you want them included in
5.1, they need to be done as early as possible.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
17 years
[Fwd: JBoss-AS-5.1.x - Build # 215 - Still Failing!]
by Dimitris Andreadis
This one's missing from the maven repo:
org.jboss.aop:jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor:jar:2.1.0.CR3
[java] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] [INFO] Building JBoss Application Server Thirdparty Build
[java] [INFO] task-segment: [generate-resources]
[java] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] Downloading:
http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/aop/jrockit-pluggable-instru...
[java] Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jboss/aop/jrockit-pluggable-instrumento...
[java] Downloading:
http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/aop/jrockit-pluggable-instru...
[java] Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jboss/aop/jrockit-pluggable-instrumento...
[java] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[java] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
[java]
[java] Missing:
[java] ----------
[java] 1) org.jboss.aop:jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor:jar:2.1.0.CR3
[java]
[java] Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
[java]
[java] Then, install it using the command:
[java] mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.jboss.aop
-DartifactId=jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor -Dversion=2.1.0.CR3 -Dpackaging=jar
-Dfile=/path/to/file
[java]
[java] Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there:
[java] mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.jboss.aop
-DartifactId=jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor -Dversion=2.1.0.CR3 -Dpackaging=jar
-Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]
[java]
[java] Path to dependency:
[java] 1) org.jboss.jbossas:jboss-as-thirdparty:pom:5.1.0-SNAPSHOT
[java] 2) org.jboss.aop:jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor:jar:2.1.0.CR3
[java]
[java] ----------
[java] 1 required artifact is missing.
[java]
[java] for artifact:
[java] org.jboss.jbossas:jboss-as-thirdparty:pom:5.1.0-SNAPSHOT
[java]
[java] from the specified remote repositories:
[java] central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
[java] repository.jboss.org (http://repository.jboss.org/maven2),
[java] snapshots.jboss.org (http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2)
[java]
[java]
[java] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
[java] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] [INFO] Total time: 16 seconds
[java] [INFO] Finished at: Tue Apr 07 10:29:13 EDT 2009
[java] [INFO] Final Memory: 22M/40M
[java] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] Java Result: 1
BUILD FAILED
/mnt/hudson_workspace/workspace/JBoss-AS-5.1.x/JBossAS_5_1/build/build.xml:1058: Unable to
build thirdparty directory. See maven output for details.
Total time: 35 seconds
[JBoss-AS-5.1.x] $ bash -xe /tmp/hudson4310315313793012501.sh
+ kill 17971
Recording fingerprints
Build was marked for publishing on https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/
Email was triggered for: Failure
There are 1 triggered emails.
Sending email for trigger: Failure
_______________________________________________
builds mailing list
builds(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/builds
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dimitris Andreadis
Manager, Application Server
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dandreadis.blogspot.com/
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.europe.redhat.com/promo/carveoutcosts/
17 years
Re: AOP 2.1.0 in AS 5?
by Kabir Khan
I have upgraded Branch_5_x to use AOP 2.1.0.CR1 and switched to use
the new classpools that understand AS classloading better. If there
are no problems I'll do a GA over the next week or so
On 16 Mar 2009, at 19:35, Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Oh ok, well you have alot of time, freeze is 6 weeks away :)
>
> Kabir Khan wrote:
>> It is ready to go. When is the freeze? I won't be around Wed-Fri
>> this week. Tomorrow is a bit tight, but if the freeze is next week
>> it should be possible
>> On 16 Mar 2009, at 18:10, Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>> Right, the question is can you have GA in place, with no
>>> regressions, by the CR1 freeze?
>>>
>>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>>> It depends how trouble-free you think this will be and what other
>>>> changes would be needed by components using it.
>>>> Kabir Khan wrote:
>>>>> I have reimplemented the classpools used by javassist in AOP to
>>>>> understand AS classloading better. For this I want to release an
>>>>> AOP 2.1.0. Can this be included in AS 5.1.0? Or do I have to wait?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Kabir
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason T. Greene
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
>
> --
> Jason T. Greene
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
17 years
mc, cl, deployers, vfs, xb, metadata component updates
by Alexey Loubyansky
I've just committed the following changes. The smoke and some other
tests passed on my machine. If you see bad regressions feel free to
rollback and let me know what the regressions are.
Thanks,
Alexey
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [jboss-cvs] JBossAS SVN: r86922 - in branches/Branch_5_x:
main/src/bin and 1 other directory.
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:19:57 -0400
From: jboss-cvs-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
Reply-To: jboss-cvs-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
To: jboss-cvs-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
Author: alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com
Date: 2009-04-07 09:19:57 -0400 (Tue, 07 Apr 2009)
New Revision: 86922
Modified:
branches/Branch_5_x/component-matrix/pom.xml
branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.bat
branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.sh
Log:
upgrade to the latest jboss-cl, deployers, xb, metadata, mc, vfs and
JBAS-6743
Modified: branches/Branch_5_x/component-matrix/pom.xml
===================================================================
--- branches/Branch_5_x/component-matrix/pom.xml 2009-04-07 13:19:38 UTC
(rev 86921)
+++ branches/Branch_5_x/component-matrix/pom.xml 2009-04-07 13:19:57 UTC
(rev 86922)
@@ -55,13 +55,13 @@
<version.org.jboss.aspects.transaction>1.0.0.GA</version.org.jboss.aspects.transaction>
<version.org.jboss.cache.core>3.1.0.CR1</version.org.jboss.cache.core>
<version.org.jboss.cache.pojo>3.0.0.GA</version.org.jboss.cache.pojo>
- <version.org.jboss.cl>2.0.4.GA</version.org.jboss.cl>
+ <version.org.jboss.cl>2.2.0.M3</version.org.jboss.cl>
<version.org.jboss.cluster.cache.jbc>1.1.0.GA</version.org.jboss.cluster.cache.jbc>
<version.org.jboss.cluster.cache.spi>1.1.0.GA</version.org.jboss.cluster.cache.spi>
<version.org.jboss.cluster.client>1.1.1.GA</version.org.jboss.cluster.client>
<version.org.jboss.cluster.server.api>1.1.0.GA</version.org.jboss.cluster.server.api>
<version.org.jboss.common.core>2.2.11.GA</version.org.jboss.common.core>
- <version.org.jboss.deployers>2.0.5.GA</version.org.jboss.deployers>
+ <version.org.jboss.deployers>2.2.0.M1</version.org.jboss.deployers>
<version.org.jboss.ejb3.common.client>1.0.0</version.org.jboss.ejb3.common.client>
<version.org.jboss.ejb3.core.client>1.1.3</version.org.jboss.ejb3.core.client>
<version.org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.client>1.0.1</version.org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.client>
@@ -69,20 +69,20 @@
<version.org.jboss.ejb3.security.client>1.0.0</version.org.jboss.ejb3.security.client>
<version.org.jboss.ejb3>1.1.3</version.org.jboss.ejb3>
<version.org.jboss.integration>5.1.0.CR2</version.org.jboss.integration>
- <version.org.jboss.jbossxb>2.0.0.GA</version.org.jboss.jbossxb>
+ <version.org.jboss.jbossxb>2.0.1.CR1</version.org.jboss.jbossxb>
<version.org.jboss.jpa>1.0.0-CR1</version.org.jboss.jpa>
<version.org.jboss.logbridge>1.0.0.CR4</version.org.jboss.logbridge>
<version.org.jboss.logmanager>1.0.0.CR3</version.org.jboss.logmanager>
<version.org.jboss.man>2.1.0.CR6</version.org.jboss.man>
<version.org.jboss.mdr>2.0.1.GA</version.org.jboss.mdr>
- <version.org.jboss.metadata>1.0.0.CR16</version.org.jboss.metadata>
-
<version.org.jboss.microcontainer>2.0.4.GA</version.org.jboss.microcontainer>
+ <version.org.jboss.metadata>1.0.0.CR17</version.org.jboss.metadata>
+
<version.org.jboss.microcontainer>2.2.0.M1</version.org.jboss.microcontainer>
<version.org.jboss.naming>5.0.1.GA</version.org.jboss.naming>
<version.org.jboss.reflect>2.0.2.GA</version.org.jboss.reflect>
<version.org.jboss.remoting>2.5.0.SP2</version.org.jboss.remoting>
<version.org.jboss.security>2.0.3.SP1</version.org.jboss.security>
<version.org.jboss.threads>1.0.0.CR4</version.org.jboss.threads>
- <version.org.jboss.vfs>2.1.0.GA</version.org.jboss.vfs>
+ <version.org.jboss.vfs>2.2.0.M1</version.org.jboss.vfs>
<version.org.jboss.xnio.metadata>1.0.0.CR1</version.org.jboss.xnio.metadata>
<version.org.jboss.xnio>1.2.1.GA</version.org.jboss.xnio>
<version.org.springframework>2.5.5</version.org.springframework>
Modified: branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.bat
===================================================================
--- branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.bat 2009-04-07 13:19:38 UTC
(rev 86921)
+++ branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.bat 2009-04-07 13:19:57 UTC
(rev 86922)
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@
rem Warn when resolving remote XML dtd/schemas
set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true
+rem This should be removed when JBoss configuration XML files can be
validated JBAS-6744
+set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Dxb.builder.useUnorderedSequence=true
+
rem With Sun JVMs reduce the RMI GCs to once per hour
set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=3600000
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000
Modified: branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.sh
===================================================================
--- branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.sh 2009-04-07 13:19:38 UTC (rev
86921)
+++ branches/Branch_5_x/main/src/bin/run.sh 2009-04-07 13:19:57 UTC (rev
86922)
@@ -228,6 +228,9 @@
# Setup JBoss specific properties
JAVA_OPTS="-Dprogram.name=$PROGNAME $JAVA_OPTS"
+# This should be removed when JBoss configuration XML files can be
validated JBAS-6744
+JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Dxb.builder.useUnorderedSequence=true"
+
# Setup the java endorsed dirs
JBOSS_ENDORSED_DIRS="$JBOSS_HOME/lib/endorsed"
_______________________________________________
jboss-cvs-commits mailing list
jboss-cvs-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-cvs-commits
17 years
Reverted AOP and Transaction updates
by Jason T. Greene
Hi Everyone,
Since the leak issues are expected to take a few more days, and are
starting to affect our ability to get reliable test results, I have
reverted AOP back to 2.0.1, and restored the previous AS integration.
I also backed out the JTA update from GA to CR1 for the time being, as
we started seeing TCK regressions.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
17 years
Which mail list is JBoss Portal dev?
by Shi Yusen
I check the mail lists, cannot make sure which one is JBoss Portal dev.
Could someone tell me?
TIA,
Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd.
17 years
Re: OSGi and Lockin, was Re: JBossOSGi - First Release
by Bill Burke
We need the java equivalent of kernel.org. Where all app servers build
off of a core neutral kernel. (Yes Ken, I stole your line...)
Burr Sutter wrote:
> I believe this is true - at least until the Enterprise spec is completed.
>
> Plus I suspect there will not be a TCK that validates the various
> implementations and helps to insure portability.
>
>
>
> Rich Sharples wrote:
>> I heard a prominent tech. analysts say that he thought *today* OSGi
>> actually does the opposite of it's portability goals due to the
>> incompleteness of the spec.; which means implementations differ in
>> some key areas.
>>
>> Any truth in this ?
>>
>> - Rich
>>
>> Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I am happy to announce the release of JBossOSGi-1.0.0.Alpha3.
>>>
>>> http://jbossosgi.blogspot.com/2009/03/jbossosgi-first-release.html
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> -thomas
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
17 years
