Re: [jboss-dev] My logging ultimatum

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 11:57 -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote: But your proposal is for the appserver to do lots work for what I will describe again as little more than a aesthetic reason. Quite frankly we've got better things to spend are time on than writing, testing and supporting a JUL->log4j adapter - even if it was technically possible e.g. weaving all your classes that do Logger.getLogger() to replace the implementation. This is the part of the argument you just don't seem to be getting. Just because you don't want to use a very simple facade, others are forced to jump through hoops with more complicated facades or accept a less than optimal solution. Anyway, I'm done with this thread. There's just no convincing some people. Either you're not seeing the whole/bigger picture "simple wrapper for you versus pain for some/everybody else" or "You cannot argue somebody out of a position using reason if they never reasoned themselves into it in the first place" :-) -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx