You mean bootstrap.xml references it. I assume this was because of the
other services in conf/jboss-service.xml using the bindings. If no
deployers due, this should be moved to deploy/bindings-jboss-beans.xml.
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
It's only needed because the naming-jboss-beans.xml descriptor
references it, I think.
If we simplify the descriptor, we should be able to do without it.
Scott Stark wrote:
> I don't think we want the bindings service in minimal. Do we still
> need the bindings.xml in bootstrap?
>
> P.S. I forgot about the minimal config. Should that be part of the
> smoke-tests?
>