On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 22:40 +0200, Ales Justin wrote:
Adrian, was this ever committed somewhere?
No. It needs a change to the transaction manager setup to make
it work properly.
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=145582
Scott Stark wrote:
> Ok by me.
>
> Adrian Brock wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 14:31 +0100, Adrian Brock wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 14:50 -0800, Scott Stark wrote:
>>>
>>>> Currently naming only depends on mc artifacts for testing. I
>>>> would create a new mcnaming for the mc specific features.
>>>>
>>> Ok, I'll create a subproject within the naming project
>>> for the MC enhancements.
>>>
>>
>> I want to provide an @JNDI annotation similar to the @JMX
>> lifecycle to make this easier for developers.
>>
>> This will be important if we ever get around to
>> changing our naming contexts to read-only since we
>> can just change the @JNDI aspect to use the new
>> mechansim for binding to jndi.
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development --
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx