Re: [jboss-dev] How to bind object to JNDI from jmx-jboss-beans.xml
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:09 +0200, Adrian Brock wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 14:57 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> On 03/25/2010 02:05 PM, Adrian Brock wrote:
> > By using the JMX connector in the JDK you loose the ability to do
> > remote JMX invocations that are involved in user transactions.
>
> How is this a bad thing? That there's even an expectation that
> transactions will "work" over JMX seems crazy to me. It's ok to
> discontinue features which don't make sense.
>
It's a bad thing because you've deleted a feature.
Yeah, I feel very naughty and bad about this. Maybe not so bad since
there are other ways to propagate transactions between tiers.
The requirement is not completely off the wall, since it came
up in the JMX 2.0 spec committee. We decided there that we
wouldn't address it, since the mechanism depends upon
the transport, e.g. UserTransaction in JavaEE or "current"
in CORBA, etc. So its really an implementation detail
(value add) of the protocol.