Looked like the file provider wasn't really transactional?
Jason T. Greene wrote:
Yeah also you can use the file provider, which has been significantly
improved. It however does not do fsyning, so doesn't have super high
durability. You could easily add that though.
Bill Burke wrote:
> Ah, they added jdbm support. Coolio.
>
> Bill Burke wrote:
>> I thought you had to use Berkely DB behind it for persistence :)?
>>
>> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>>> Bill Burke wrote:
>>>>> I'm looking for a small key/value pure Java transactional store
that's
>>>>> not GPL and thats distributed with LGPL based projects through maven
or
>>>>> whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody have any suggestions?
>>>> infinispan!
>>>>
>>>
http://infinispan.blogspot.com/2010/02/infinispan-as-local-cache.html
>>>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com