Why don't we do this for JBossCache and PojoCache (with quite some deps)
already ?
Because the embeded JARs might conflict with the user's copies
(different versions) ?
BTW: I'm really looking forward to Java 7's java feature which let's you
list directories with JARs, rather than the individual JARs
Jason T. Greene wrote:
Bela Ban wrote:
>
>
> David M. Lloyd wrote:
>> The fact is, zero JARs is better than one, no matter how small it is.
>
> +1000. I hope to ship only jgroups.jar some day. And I hope that day
> will come before I retire... :-)
>
Having one jar is awesome. You can do that today though, even with deps!
http://code.google.com/p/jarjar/
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat