Re: [jboss-dev] Abstract classes?
I think they *were* abstract at one point, but then someone realized that
they shouldn't be, for whatever reason. Seems like a bit of a design red
flag to me though.
- DML
On 05/25/2009 04:19 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I have seen many classes in some JBoss core projects whose names
start
with "Abstract" but the classes are *not* abstract. Just to cite an
example, there's AbstractInjectionValueMetaData - not picking on this
specific class, but this is just an example. Any reason why we are
naming them Abstract?
regards,
-Jaikiran
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development