It is hopefully something simple, so I'll fix those tomorrow before John's VFS
upgrade
On 28 Feb 2010, at 09:24, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Nice! "default" boots in 20 to 21 seconds for me now (down
from 23 to 25
seconds):
14:50:07,608 INFO [org.jboss.bootstrap.impl.base.server.AbstractServer]
JBossAS [6.0.0.SNAPSHOT "Neo"] Started in 20s:953ms
regards,
-Jaikiran
Kabir Khan wrote:
> I have upgraded trunk to use kernel 2.2.0.Alpha7 and mdr 2.2.0.Alpha2 which contain
the performance fixes I have been working on. For my own record the last hudson run before
this was
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-6.0.x-test...
> On 26 Feb 2010, at 17:52, Scott Marlow wrote:
>
>> My understanding is that Java String memory will do down for various
>> reasons. One of them being fewer full path references with VFS3.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:40 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Brian Stansberry
>>> <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm curious to see where we stand on that front when the VFS3
>>>> integration is done in a week or so.
>>> I didn't have the impression that VFS was a factor here, but we'll
see
>>> when this is integrated.
>>>
>>> Rémy
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development