Re: [jboss-dev] JMX stuff WAS Re: M2 planning and timeline

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:45 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > It would be interesting to see if their is any performance difference using our or JDK's > mbeanserver implementation. > It doesn't seem to make an appreachable difference for the boot time or running the basic tests. It might show a difference if you stressed an MBeanServer.invoke() like we do in EJB2? Anyway, I've added this to trunk now. You can try it with ./run.sh -Djavax.management.builder.initial=org.jboss.jmx.mbeanserver.JBossMBeanServerBuilder I seem to have a bug with the remote jmx usage and classloading which I need to investigate. e.g. using the jmx-remoting.sar classloader instead of the jmx deployment's classloader.