On 3 Jan 2010, at 19:15, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 01/03/2010 09:05 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>> True, but we use @JMX all over the place. I expect trying to get rid of
>> it and having all our POJO services register themselves in JMX will end
>> up sucking in most of the AS team, which will be a significant
>> distraction from EE 6 work. Personally I think we should explore further
>> whether this can be optimized before going down that path.
>>
>
> This is something I wouldn't mind doing if Kabir finds that AOP can't be
> optimized.
The fact that @JMX uses AOP is an implementation detail. Surely there's a
non-AOP way to do this, which doesn't involve every service registering
itself in JMX?
See previously on this list - I will be replacing the AOP stuff handling JMX with
something else. Give me a day or two
- DML
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development