Re: AspectManager in the wrong bucket WAS Re: [jboss-dev] Deployment chains

> Implementation details should go in the transient attachments. > Which is the default if you use addAttachment().

So where are you saying I should put it? On 6 Oct 2008, at 16:17, Adrian Brock wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 17:08 +0200, Adrian Brock wrote: >> A sample output is attached (this is for the console-mgr.sar) > > The sample out on the earlier post shows that > org.jboss.aop.asintegration.jboss5.AOPClassLoaderDeployer > is putting the AspectManager attachment in the wrong "bucket". > > Implementation details should go in the transient attachments. > Which is the default if you use addAttachment(). > > The managed objects are intended to hold attachments that > come from xml so we can differentiate what we create and > what the user specified. > > e.g. You'll also see that for the console-mgr.sar > the ClassLoadingMetaData is also in the transient attachments. > That is because it was created from the <loader-repository/> > xml of the -service.xml. > If it had come from META-INF/jboss-classloading.xml > it would be in the managed objects. > -- > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Adrian Brock > Chief Scientist > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development