Ask on jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org. It's a totally appropriate
question for the list and you're more likely to get an answer since a
number of more technical people kinda ignore thecore.
Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
Brian,
Do you think it is inappropriate to ask for help on the core regarding
this issue? I am ripping my hair out by now trying to figure this one out!
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 1/21/09 4:52 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> On 1/20/09 1:55 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
>> You should specify a namespace using targetNamespace, so that
>> components like JBC can inline the jgroups config into the JBC
>> config. Current practice is to use a URN style URL for the namespace
>> instead of http. I would also recommend bundling the schema in the
>> jgroups jar in META-INF/schemas so that you can optionally enable
>> schema validation without requiring the schema file in the install.
> Do you mean having a schema declaration start like this:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> targetNamespace="urn:org:jgroups">
>
> If I have a jgroups conf file:
>
> <config xmlns="urn:org:jgroups"
>
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>
>
xsi:schemaLocation="file:/Users/vladimir/workspace/JGroups-HEAD/JGroups-2.7.xsd">
>
> <UDP
> mcast_addr="${jgroups.udp.mcast_addr:232.10.10.10}"
> mcast_port="${jgroups.udp.mcast_port:45588}"
> ....
>
>
> then for some reason my editor (Oxygen) always reports that conf file
> is well formed - even if it clearly is not.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com