Those are the revision numbers (first one was last):
Should we revert one by one in reverse order?
65826, 65825, 65820, 65819, 65818, 65817, 65816, 65815, 65814, 65813, 65812, 65811, 65810,
65809, 65808, 65807, 65806
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
I just noticed Franscisco's check-ins this morning. I think we
need to
revert the changes for now, but unfortunately the check-ins done were
multiple.
Adrian wrote:
> Why has the transaction module been removed?
>
> The stuff required to make this work properly is still WIP:
>
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4516
>
> In fact, I'm currently working on fixing up the testsuite
> to make this possible at all.
>
> The XIDFactory stuff is expected as per the subtask:
>
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4517
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:12 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> After the removal of the transaction module, booting the 'default'
>> and 'all' configs complains initially for the missing
>> org.jboss.tm.XidFactory, then about missing jbossts libs...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development