11:42 a.m.
Does it make sense to put it here?
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/s...
Or need another module under javaee?
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Where should we put these two new annotations ?
Thanks,
Rémy
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
11:48 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Does it make sense to put it here?
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/s...
Or need another module under javaee?
No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is
missing things right now for sure. Like JSP.
Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs.
Rémy
11:59 a.m.
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis
<dandread(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Does it make sense to put it here?
>
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/s...
>
> Or need another module under javaee?
No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is
missing things right now for sure. Like JSP.
Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs.
Tell that to all the project that want full control of the apis. :-)
12:09 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> Does it make sense to put it here?
>>
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/s...
>>
>> Or need another module under javaee?
>
> No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is
> missing things right now for sure. Like JSP.
> Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs.
Tell that to all the project that want full control of the apis. :-)
Ok, got it. So for now I'll add the two annotations in metadata-common
to be able to do the work ;)
Rémy
12:32 p.m.
We can do the same as we recently did for javax.interceptor APIs:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2009-October/014967.html
Shelly
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rémy Maucherat" <remy.maucherat(a)gmail.com>
To: "JBoss.org development list" <jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:09:18 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [jboss-dev] sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotations
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> Does it make sense to put it here?
>>
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/s...
>>
>> Or need another module under javaee?
>
> No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is
> missing things right now for sure. Like JSP.
> Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs.
Tell that to all the project that want full control of the apis. :-)
Ok, got it. So for now I'll add the two annotations in metadata-common
to be able to do the work ;)
Rémy
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
5531
days inactive
5531
days old
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dimitris Andreadis -
Rémy Maucherat -
Shelly McGowan