I believe SBM is enabled in the ServiceController.
Nevertheless my point is, we shouldn't retire things expected to work from 4.x until
we have
working alternatives. Same goes for 'farming'.
Scott M Stark wrote:
I don't thinks its important. Beyond the wrapper you would still
need to
enable the sbm in the ServiceController.
Brian Stansberry wrote:
> That sounds like my #2. Or are you saying load the whole unrefactored
> thing from the deployers dir, but via a -service.xml? Possible but don't
> know if that would cause issues.
>
> I can spend a couple hours today/tomorrow experimenting with the wrapper
> concept, and maybe simply deploying via service.xml. But I don't want to
> waste effort unless there's agreement that getting SBM to work for Beta4
> is an important goal. And if there's consensus (e.g. from Remy) that
> whatever I'm trying is an acceptable temporary measure if it works.
>