[jboss-dev] Usage of consistent groupIds/artifactIds

So jbossws appears at: http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/ jboss jbossws-common jbossws-framework jbossws-jboss50 jbossws-jdk14 jbossws-spi jbossws jbossws14 and org/jboss jbossws-client jbossws-spi I guess the org/jboss is the most current? Going forward, can we agree on a common set of guidelines what goes where? Or else, define consistent groupIds not only for jboss projects but for the thirdparty ones, too? Aren't there any maven best practises? Can we remove legacy maven stuff that is probably not in use yet? (that could be tricky) Can we agree on common rules for defining artifactIds/libs? Take a look a AS server/all/lib to understand what I mean. Most libs are like jboss-id[-id2].jar. But then you have jbossha.jar (but jboss-ha-client.jar), jbossws-*.jar, jbosssx*.jar, jbosscache*.jar, jbossts/jta.jar, etc. At least, we should be consistent for new components/libs.