If you have a tag, and you dont want people writing to the branch, then
the branch is useless. Just get rid of it.
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
if you want to prevent commits then just adjust the
/admin/authz_svn.conf to make that branch readonly.
/max
> Renaming/removing the branch won't have any effect on the tags [1].
> But I don't think renaming it to _Dead is a good idea. If it really
> is dead, then why not just delete it? You can always create a branch
> from one of the tags if you find that you need the branch again.
>
> [1]
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.branchmerge.maint.html
>
> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> I suppose the other option would be to make it read-only in
>> authz_svn.conf
>>
>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>> svn rename is really copy+delete. Do you have any idea if it will
>>> affect tags taken out of Branch_5_0? If not, I suppose we can do it.
>>>
>>> Kabir Khan wrote:
>>>>> a) the branch that produced AS 5.0.0.GA should be considered
>>>>> "dead". We won't be doing a dot release from this
branch (5.0.1.CR1)
>>>>>
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/branches/Branch_5_0/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can it be renamed to
>>>>
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/branches/Branch_5_0_DEAD?
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat