Ask on jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org. It's a totally appropriate question for the list and you're more likely to get an answer since a number of more technical people kinda ignore thecore. Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > Brian, > > Do you think it is inappropriate to ask for help on the core regarding > this issue? I am ripping my hair out by now trying to figure this one > out! > > Thanks, > Vladimir > > On 1/21/09 4:52 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: >> On 1/20/09 1:55 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote: >>> You should specify a namespace using targetNamespace, so that >>> components like JBC can inline the jgroups config into the JBC >>> config. Current practice is to use a URN style URL for the namespace >>> instead of http. I would also recommend bundling the schema in the >>> jgroups jar in META-INF/schemas so that you can optionally enable >>> schema validation without requiring the schema file in the install. >> Do you mean having a schema declaration start like this: >> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" >> targetNamespace="urn:org:jgroups"> >> >> If I have a jgroups conf file: >> >> <config xmlns="urn:org:jgroups" >> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" >> >> xsi:schemaLocation="file:/Users/vladimir/workspace/JGroups-HEAD/JGroups-2.7.xsd"> >> >> <UDP >> mcast_addr="${jgroups.udp.mcast_addr:232.10.10.10}" >> mcast_port="${jgroups.udp.mcast_port:45588}" >> .... >> >> >> then for some reason my editor (Oxygen) always reports that conf file >> is well formed - even if it clearly is not. >> >> What am I doing wrong? >> >> Regards, >> Vladimir >> >